Write a review

MOTORCYCLE Type

Other types

Make and model

Year

2002 Royal Enfield reviews

4.3 (3 reviews)
Write a review
Reliability
4.3
Overall quality
4.3
Performance
4.3
Comfort
4.3

Top 10 Motorcycles

Reviews

Stars Refinement

3 ratings and reviews

Voted most helpful review

Tim Frigon

Chandler, Arizona

Reviewed on October 12, 2003

Motorcycle reviewed 2002 Royal Enfield 500 Classic view listing

4.0
Anyone who's reading this knows a little about this bike already. It's made in India in the same factory with the same techniques they used when starting production in 1955. The newest versions have a higher output alternator and electric starting to go with the kick starter. The bike is slow by modern sta... read more
Anyone who's reading this knows a little about this bike already. It's made in India in the same factory with the same techniques they used when starting production in 1955. The newest versions have a higher output alternator and electric starting to go with the kick starter. The bike is slow by modern standards, with 55 mph as the upper comfort limit. The engine is stone simple, but does require some maintenance (just like the good old days). You can learn how to gap points, set timing, adjust brakes, adjust valve lash, adjust the clutch, and all that fun stuff. I've got almost 1000 miles on my 2003, and have been averaging 72 mpg so far. I've had some trouble with the forks leaking from the top, and the dealer is on their second attempt at fixing it. As delivered, the front hub was also out of round, causing pulsing of the front brake, but that was fixed under warranty. It's a true classic, with all the advantages and warts included. If you're a "real" motorcyclist, and don't mind turning a wrench as much as you enjoy putting along, then you'll love it. If you want a "hit the key and go" modern type bike, spend a whole lot more money and get one of the modern Japanese bikes or the Triumph Bonneville. This one's the real deal, classic wise.
Reliability
4.0
Quality
4.0
Performance
4.0
Comfort
4.0
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

Matt Miller

Lafayette, Louisiana

Reviewed on April 7, 2003

Motorcycle reviewed 2002 Royal Enfield 500 Classic view listing

5.0
Ok, so mine is a 2000 and not a 2002. However, it is the EXACT same in every way. In fact, 99% of this motorcycle is the exact same as the 1956 model. It is built using the same technology, processes, and materials, by hand, as the 1956 model. This is a modern-made, vintage classic bike. It is British, but is... read more
Ok, so mine is a 2000 and not a 2002. However, it is the EXACT same in every way. In fact, 99% of this motorcycle is the exact same as the 1956 model. It is built using the same technology, processes, and materials, by hand, as the 1956 model. This is a modern-made, vintage classic bike. It is British, but is now made only in India. For the true motorcycle enthusiast, you will be thrilled with this gem. For the average pleasure-rider, you may go insans. This very simple engine requires regular maintenance, and you should do it yourself. It can all be done with simple tools, but requires some effort. Nothing on the bike is that complicated, and the average man can really learn alot about mechanics and engines through the Enfield. It is a true joy to ride, with the literal feel of a classic 1950s bike. It handles beautifully, and there are countless modifications and accessories you can add. This bike is NOt for the casual rider who prefers no maintenance, or who does not know much about his bike. Hint -- if you have never taken apart your carburettor, for example, then this is not the bike for you. Go Japanese. However, for the person who really wants to be one with his bike, and who is interested in performing minor and major maintenance and repairs himself, and who appreciate a true classic, this is a true pleasure to own and ride. I would highly recommend for anyone who is serious about motorcylcles.
Reliability
5.0
Quality
5.0
Performance
5.0
Comfort
5.0
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
Voted most helpful review

X X

Indianapolis, Indiana

Reviewed on September 8, 2002

Motorcycle reviewed 2002 Royal Enfield 500 Classic view listing

4.0
A simple bike with lots of character. I get comments EVERY time I ride it. Always lots of fun. However, needs frequent maintainance that can be done at home. Not very fast... it won't make it on the interstate. Plan to spend some $ on much needed accessories.... read more
A simple bike with lots of character. I get comments EVERY time I ride it. Always lots of fun. However, needs frequent maintainance that can be done at home. Not very fast... it won't make it on the interstate. Plan to spend some $ on much needed accessories.
Reliability
4.0
Quality
4.0
Performance
4.0
Comfort
4.0
Show less
Helpful (0)

FlagReport

Flag this review
Please select a reason
  • 1
  • 1 - 3 of 3 reviews