Write a review

MOTORCYCLE Type

Other types

Make and model

    Year

    1984 Harley-Davidson reviews

    3.4 (3 reviews)
    Write a review
    Reliability
    3.7
    Overall quality
    3.3
    Performance
    3.3
    Comfort
    3.3

    Top 10 Motorcycles

      Reviews

      Stars Refinement

      3 ratings and reviews

      Voted most helpful review

      Reviewed on May 21, 2024

      Motorcycle reviewed 1984 Harley-Davidson FXST Softail Standard view listing

      4.3
      1984 Softail first year Evo motor tons of upgrades floorboards, 4 seats., Extra parts, front tubes are six over. The bike turns heads Barbara, One owner always garage kept motor rebuild polished... read more
      1984 Softail first year Evo motor tons of upgrades floorboards, 4 seats., Extra parts, front tubes are six over. The bike turns heads Barbara, One owner always garage kept motor rebuild polished cases.
      Show less
      Helpful (0)

      FlagReport

      Flag this review
      Please select a reason
      Voted most helpful review

      Reviewed on August 29, 2000

      Motorcycle reviewed 1984 Harley-Davidson FXSB Low Rider view listing

      3.0
      This bike is a one of a kind bike. It was the end of the shovelhead. Which is the best sounding Harley ever produced. It is belt driven from the engine to the primary. It has drag pipes and drag bars. It is a collector's item. Great looks, sound, and ride. It has a dry clutch witch is a little... read more
      This bike is a one of a kind bike. It was the end of the shovelhead. Which is the best sounding Harley ever produced. It is belt driven from the engine to the primary. It has drag pipes and drag bars. It is a collector's item. Great looks, sound, and ride. It has a dry clutch witch is a little noisy but that is the nature of the beast.
      Show less
      Helpful (0)

      FlagReport

      Flag this review
      Please select a reason
      Voted most helpful review

      Reviewed on June 28, 2000

      Motorcycle reviewed 1984 Harley-Davidson XLX-61 view listing

      3.0
      The bike is nice to ride. It's a lot of fun. It could have some more power, but for touring is quit enough. It uses more fuel then expected (7 liter per 100 km) but that can be an adjustment. In general: I like it for a few years, then I'm gonna buy me something... read more
      The bike is nice to ride. It's a lot of fun. It could have some more power, but for touring is quit enough. It uses more fuel then expected (7 liter per 100 km) but that can be an adjustment. In general: I like it for a few years, then I'm gonna buy me something else.
      Show less
      Helpful (0)

      FlagReport

      Flag this review
      Please select a reason
      • 1